When implementing the Digital Product Passport, will companies prefer to print a unique identifier on the packaging at an early stage and manage all product information purely online — or apply the code only at the final production step, enabling late-stage data like batch or expiry to also be encoded and read offline?
1 respuesta todavía
Usuario anónimo
Hey Emely, very good question. As always the answer is: it depends. Mostly it will depend on the product category and the content of the DPP that will be published in the different delegated acts. For some products information on product level (GTIN) will be OK, for other categories the DPP has to be applied to batch or even serial level (e.g. CE).
Open is also the question where the DPP has to be applied. Is the package good enough or does it have to be applied on the product itself. Again, the delegated acts will tell us more.
Time will tell..
Hola Emely,
buena pregunta y supongo que la respuesta es como siempre: depende.
Dependerá sobre todo del sector y del respectivo acto delegado. Una gran pregunta es si el DPP debe construirse a nivel de serie, lote o modelo.
También es relevante la cuestión de dónde debe aplicarse el DPP. ¿Basta con el envase o tiene que estar en el propio producto? De nuevo, variará en función de los actos delegados.
Supongo que es demasiado pronto para decir ..